Trend at a glance
Low-density sprawl is still the norm in Cascadia's cities.
But compact communities are gradually gaining ground:
the share of residents living in walkable or transit-oriented neighborhoods has increased in each major Northwest metropolis since 1990.
Still, given recent trends, it will take 58 years for the Cascadian city average to match the compact-growth record that Vancouver, BC, has already achieved.
Keys to combating sprawl include strong protections for farmland and open space at the urban fringe;
promoting infill development; and limiting sprawl-inducing road projects.
Updated April 2009.
(Click for more information on Sightline's sprawl research.)
More about sprawl
What the sprawl indicator measures and why
The Scorecard measures sprawl by the share of residents who live in neighborhoods with at
least 12 residents per acre.
Read more
International research suggests that at about this density,
transit and walking start to become viable alternatives to the car, at least for some everyday trips.
Neighborhoods with such densities also tend to support more local stores and services,
allowing residents to drive less in their daily lives.
As a result, residents of compact neighborhoods consume less gasoline, and create fewer
climate-warming emissions for everyday transportation needs, than do residents of more sprawling locales.
Compact development also covers less of the landscape with pavement, and spares farmland, forests,
and lowland habitats at the urban fringe from scattered sprawl.
Read less
The target and why it was chosen
The Scorecard's target measurement for sprawl is 64 percent of a metropolitan area's urban and suburban residents living in transit-friendly, walkable neighborhoods.
That was the average for Vancouver, BC, as of 2001 -- the most recent data that was available when the Cascadia Scorecard was launched in 2004.
Read more
Long-term trends
Since at least World War II, sprawl -- dispersed, poorly planned, car-centered development that
segregates homes from stores and jobs -- has been the dominant form of residential development in North America.
Read more
Sprawl contributes to a panoply of ills.
It confines residents in their cars for virtually every trip;
increases transportation and infrastructure costs; frays forests; harms streams and wildlife;
overruns farmland; and commits the region to exorbitant expenditures on roads, vehicles, and highway fuels.
It even undermines health by limiting exercise and increasing car crashes,
as the 2006 edition of the Cascadia Scorecard detailed.
(Click to read more about the 2006 Cascadia Scorecard.)
In past editions of the Cascadia Scorecard, Sightline analyzed and mapped sprawl in the Northwest's 7 largest cities,
as well as in 12 additional cities across the United States.
These analyses showed that as major Northwest cities grow in population,
they are also making gradual progress in channeling new growth into compact, transit- and pedestrian-oriented neighborhoods.
(Click for chart of smart-growth trends in Cascadian cities.)
Still, low-density development at the urban fringe remains common throughout Cascadia.
Today, nearly two-thirds of the people living in Cascadia's major metropolitan areas reside in a neighborhood where a car is a virtual necessity.
Read less
The results in detail
Among cities throughout the United States, Portland, Oregon, has earned well-deserved recognition for land use
rules that preserve farmland and open space from sprawling development.
(Click for map of sprawl on Portland's urban fringe.)
Yet within Cascadia, it is Vancouver, BC, that leads the way in creating compact communities.
Read more
A combination of factors -- ranging from a topography constrained by water and mountains,
to British Columbia's province-wide farmland protection policies,
to political leadership committed to preserving a "livable region," to a less extensive highway system than is found in many
parts of North America --
has helped channel much of Vancouver's new growth into already-developed areas.
(Click for animated map of development trends in greater Vancouver.)
But data from the 2006 Canadian Census revealed a surprise:
Greater Vancouver's leadership in compact growth slipped during the last census period.
Compared with the previous decade,
the share of new urban and suburban growth that went into compact communities declined,
while the amount of land developed to accommodate new residents increased. This slowdown in
smart growth took place at a time when overall population growth slowed as well. Those two trends may be linked:
slower-growing cities may be less likely to accommodate new residents in higher-density developments.
Despite the disappointing smart-growth news, the cities of Vancouver
and North Vancouver did make notable progress in fostering walkable,
pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods between 2001 and 2006. In Vancouver,
neighborhoods with "pedestrian-oriented" densities (at least 40 residents per acre) grew by 27,000
residents. That was about four-fifths of all population growth that occurred within city limits.
By 2006, more than one in four city residents, or nearly 160,000 Vancouverites, lived in neighborhoods
with pedestrian-oriented densities.
(Click to read "Slowing Down," Sightline's report on recent smart growth trends in greater Vancouver.)
Read less
Portland and Clark County, WA
Smart-growth records, Northwest cities
Animated map of Vancouver sprawl