Trend at a glance
The five Cascadian wildlife populations tracked by the Scorecard remain far below their historic abundance.
But there are a few promising signs for these Northwest icons.
Wolves have staged a remarkable comeback in Montana and Idaho in recent years,
while chinook salmon and southern resident orca populations both experienced promising (though perhaps temporary) gains.
Even the fragile Selkirk caribou population had showed some tentative increases before a recent stumble.
Oregon's greater sage-grouse, however, continue to struggle.
To move these species off life support, Cascadians can work to restore the natural landscapes and ecosystems on which they depend.
Updated June 2010.
(Click for more information on Sightline's wildlife research.)
More about wildlife
What the wildlife indicator measures and why
The Cascadia Scorecard's wildlife indicator tracks five key wildlife populations:
gray wolves in Idaho and Montana; the Selkirk herd of mountain caribou;
Oregon's greater sage-grouse; the southern resident orcas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Georgia;
and the chinook salmon that return in the spring and summer to the Columbia River.
Read more
The Scorecard treats these species as proxies for the natural wealth that northwesterners have inherited,
and for our stewardship of that inheritance.
If the region's forests, deserts, rivers, and marine waters are healthy and thriving,
then Cascadia's salmon, orcas, wolves, caribou, and sage-grouse will thrive too.
If not, these creatures will dwindle and disappear.
Read less
The target and why it was chosen
The Scorecard sets modest targets for the wildlife indicator: restoring key wildlife populations to one-third or
one-half of their historical abundance
(meaning the numbers present before European settlers arrived).
Read more
More than for any other indicator, this goal is a judgment call.
Full restoration may be impossible in a region where 16 million human inhabitants have so dramatically affected the balance of natural ecosystems.
And scientists are unsure about how large wildlife populations must be in order to remain vibrant and self-sustaining,
particularly as climate disruption continues.
Nevertheless, restoring these species to a third or a half of their original abundance seems a worthy, if distant, goal.
(Click to read about how the Scorecard works, including how targets are chosen.)
Read less
Long-term trends
For the region's first human inhabitants, Cascadia was defined by its wildlife.
The spectacularly abundant salmon played a central role in First Nations' cultures,
while orcas, wolves, and countless other species populated tribal myths.
Read more
Today those creatures' abundance is severely reduced.
(Click for chart of wildlife trends.)
Even so, Cascadia's native species remain not only a source of wonder and fascination,
but also an economic engine for tourism, fisheries, and other industries.
Just as important, the abundance of the region's wildlife offers insights into the health
of the natural ecosystems that support and enrich our lives.
Read less
The results in detail
The five wildlife species tracked by the Scorecard average only 16 percent of their historical abundance,
and there are many reasons to be concerned about their future.
All five face a range of threats, some specific to their habitats but others more general,
including climate change and other rising human impacts on natural systems.
Read more
SALMON
Each year, the chinook (or "king") salmon journey up the Columbia River, past dams, deserts, cities, and farms,
to spawn in their natal streams. In 2009, more than 300,000 chinook passed the Columbia River's Bonneville Dam,
146 miles upstream from the river's mouth on the Pacific Ocean.
It was a strong showing for the fish: a 29 percent increase over the previous year and the
second consecutive year of increasing numbers. Yet annual population fluctuations send murky messages
about the health of the fish. Chinook counts vary by about 40 percent a year on average,
mostly due to natural population dynamics. Only long-term monitoring can reveal meaningful trends in the population.
And last year's fish count, while good by the standards of the past 25 years, is still a very poor showing in historical terms:
less than 11 percent of historical abundance. And the true story is even bleaker: wild salmon probably return at less than
3 percent of their former numbers.
The rest of the returning salmon are hatchery-raised fish, whose numbers are far less meaningful as signals of the region's
ecological health.
ORCAS
The "southern resident" orcas live much of their lives in the inland marine waters of Puget Sound and the Georgia Strait.
After a worrisome seven-year decline starting in 1995,
the number of southern resident orcas began to increase.
After a population dip in 2008, the orcas welcomed five new calves in 2009.
Many orca experts say that an abundance—or shortage—of salmon is the biggest factor determining
what happens to the southern residents, highlighting the important connections between two of the Northwest's iconic species.
(Click for more information about orca population trends
and recovery efforts.)
WOLVES
The most promising trend in the wildlife indicator is the rapid increase in Rocky Mountain wolves, though population growth
slowed in 2009 due to new recreational hunts in Montana and Idaho and increased conflicts with domesticated animals. Wolf numbers are
still at perhaps 10 percent of their levels prior to European contact.
Wolves had been systematically eradicated from the western United States by the middle of the twentieth century.
(Click for map of historic and modern wolf range.)
But in the mid-1990s, federal officials reintroduced a few dozen gray wolves to the wilderness of
central Idaho and to Yellowstone National Park.
Since then the wolves have flourished,
expanding their range and number faster than even the most optimistic projections.
At the end of 2009, biologists estimated that there were more than 1,706 wolves in the US Rockies. (Idaho, Montana, Washington and Oregon,
whose wolf numbers are now counted by the Scorecard, boasted some 1,386 wolves.) These populations may be near their peak, as wolves have
likely recolonized most of the good habitat available to them.
Today, pioneer wolves originating from both Idaho and British Columbia are returning to their historic range in Oregon and Washington. In 2009,
federal biologists counted 14 wolves in Oregon and 5 in Washington, though it remains to be seen how quickly they will repopulate that territory.
CARIBOU
The most endangered large mammal in North America, mountain caribou retain only the barest foothold south of the Canadian border,
and are in danger of extirpation. In the remote Selkirk Mountains of northeast Washington, northern Idaho,
and southern British Columbia, one caribou herd persists; the Scorecard includes their precarious numbers as a proxy
for the populations of mountain caribou across the northern regions.
(Click for map of historic and modern caribou range.)
In 2010, biologists counted only 43 animals in the Selkirk caribou herd, 3 fewer than the previous two years.
But it's not clear whether this represents a one-year decline or a more serious problem for the tiny population.
The caribou are threatened on several sides.
Clearcut logging has reduced the old growth trees that host the lichen that the caribou depend on for food.
People, especially those on snowmobiles, startle the animals in winter and cause them to expend
scarce calories to flee through deep snow.
And predators such as cougars traverse the hardened snowmobile tracks into the herd's winter range--travel
that the predators could not otherwise manage.
SAGE-GROUSE
The greater sage-grouse, a desert-dwelling bird known for its astonishing breeding displays,
is one of the best indicators of the health of the Northwest's interior sage deserts.
As its name implies, the bird depends on relatively intact sagebrush landscapes,
much of which has been degraded by ranching, fencing, invasive species, mining, and off-road vehicles.
When Lewis and Clark traveled through the Columbia Basin, they observed sage-grouse in great numbers.
Today, only two small remnant populations survive in eastern Washington.
But in Oregon, where sage habitat is remoter and more intact, sage-grouse numbers are relatively stable.
Recent years, however, have revealed worrisome declines.
Today, biologists estimate that only about
22,000 of the birds remain in Oregon--the lowest number ever recorded,
and less than 15 percent of the species' historical abundance in that state.
(Click for map of historic and current sage-grouse range.)
Read less
Wildlife trends
Wolf range
Caribou range
Sage-grouse range